Map and Analyze Software Dependencies
A skill mapping, visualizing, and risk-scoring software dependencies, including circular-dependency detection.
Why it matters
Automate the comprehensive mapping, analysis, and visualization of software dependencies across various ecosystems. This asset helps identify critical paths, potential bottlenecks, and security risks to improve system architecture and maintainability.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Extract direct, transitive, and circular dependencies using ecosystem-specific tools.
Analyze dependency health, including freshness, security vulnerabilities, and license compatibility.
Visualize dependency structures using graph and matrix representations.
Identify critical path dependencies and potential bottlenecks for risk assessment.
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/vb-dependency-mapper | bash Overview
Dependency Mapper агент
This skill extracts and visualizes a codebase's dependency graph per ecosystem (npm, pip, Maven/Gradle, .NET), detects circular dependencies and critical nodes via graph analysis, and enforces a license/security risk policy. Use it when a codebase's dependency graph needs to be extracted, visualized, or audited for risk rather than just installed and forgotten.
What it does
This skill maps, analyzes, and visualizes dependencies in software systems, covering build tools, package managers, architectural patterns, and project-management methods for complex interdependencies. It classifies dependencies into six types: direct (immediate requirements/imports), transitive (dependencies of dependencies), circular (mutual dependencies forming cycles), optional (conditional or feature-specific), development (build/test-time only), and runtime (production-execution requirements). Mapping strategy starts from entry points and traces outward, identifies critical-path dependencies, distinguishes compile-time from runtime dependencies, maps both code-level and system-level dependencies, and tracks version constraints and compatibility requirements.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use it when a codebase's dependency graph needs to be extracted, visualized, or audited for risk - not just installed and forgotten. Automated-discovery commands are given per ecosystem: npm ls --depth=0 / npm ls --all / npx depcheck for Node.js, pipdeptree --graph-output png / pip-licenses --format=json for Python, mvn dependency:tree / mvn dependency:analyze / gradle dependencies for Java, and dotnet list package --include-transitive for .NET.
Inputs and outputs
Manual analysis is shown via a Python AST walker that extracts import/from...import statements per file and builds a project-wide dependency map. Visualization patterns include a D3.js node/link graph and a Mermaid flowchart for service-level architecture, plus a Dependency Structure Matrix (DSM) built as a pandas DataFrame from a module list and their dependency edges. Critical-path analysis includes a function ranking nodes by in-degree (most-depended-on) to surface the top 5 critical dependencies, and a DFS-based cycle detector that returns the actual circular dependency chains found. Build-system integration covers GitHub Actions dependency caching plus generating license and unused-dependency reports, and a multi-stage Dockerfile that separates a production-only dependency-install stage from the full build stage. Risk assessment tracks five health metrics - freshness (age and available updates), security (known vulnerabilities and CVE scores), maintenance (activity level and contributor count), license compatibility, and bundle-size impact - enforceable via a JSON policy schema with per-rule severity, allowed license lists, and staleness thresholds that trigger block/warn/review actions.
Who it's for
Engineering and platform teams who need to understand, visualize, and govern a codebase's dependency graph - including catching circular dependencies and enforcing license/security policy automatically - rather than relying on npm ls output alone. Architectural guidance closes the loop from analysis to prevention: minimize circular dependencies through layered architecture, use dependency inversion for testability and flexibility, apply adapter patterns for external service dependencies, and consider micro-frontend or microservice patterns once a system has grown large enough that its dependency graph is becoming unmanageable as a single unit.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.