Diagnose data pipeline performance bottlenecks
Diagnoses slow pipelines and queries across Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouses using a tiered Monte Carlo investigation flow.
Why it matters
Identify and resolve performance issues across data pipelines by analyzing cross-platform observability data from Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouse query engines to pinpoint slow jobs, expensive queries, regressions, and root causes.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Find the slowest jobs and most expensive queries across all platforms
Drill into task-level bottlenecks and trace which specific operations are causing delays
Correlate query changes, volume shifts, and failures on a unified timeline to identify what triggered regressions
Analyze query failure patterns and latency distributions to recommend specific optimization actions
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-monte-carlo-performance-diagnosis | bash Overview
Monte Carlo Performance Diagnosis Skill
This skill diagnoses slow pipelines, jobs, and queries across Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouses using 9 tiered Monte Carlo tools, from discovery through task-level and query-level root-cause analysis. Use it when a pipeline, job, or query is slow or has regressed in performance. Not for data quality issues, storage costs, monitor creation, or general data exploration - those are separate skills.
What it does
A Monte Carlo skill that diagnoses data pipeline performance issues - bottlenecks, regressions, and root causes - across Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouse query engines, using 9 tools organized into a tiered investigation. Tier 1 discovery calls get_jobs_performance (slow/failing jobs, optionally filtered by integration type, returning average duration, 7-day trend, run count, and failure rate) and get_top_slow_queries (slowest query groups by total runtime, filterable to read or write queries). A bridge tool, get_tables_for_job, converts a problematic job's MCON to table MCONs for deeper investigation. Tier 2 diagnosis then drills in: get_tasks_performance finds the bottleneck task within a job; get_change_timeline - described as the most powerful tool - returns a single unified timeline of query text changes, volume shifts, and Airflow/dbt task failures, surfacing correlations like a query change followed by doubled runtime the next day; get_query_rca gives pre-computed root-cause groupings for failed queries (errors, timeouts, permissions) and futile queries (ones that run but produce no useful output); get_query_latency_distribution shows p50-vs-p95 trends to distinguish outlier-driven latency from a genuine regression, with an hourly bucket option since the default daily downsampling hides hour-level step-changes; and get_asset_lineage traces downstream impact or upstream causes. A supporting get_warehouses call lists available warehouses to scope the investigation. The skill enforces quoting tool-returned numbers exactly rather than rounding or estimating, comparing against 7-day trend baselines to separate regressions from normal variance, and stopping once a root cause is found - a typical investigation takes 3-7 tool calls, and more than 10 signals over-investigation.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use it when someone asks why a pipeline, job, or query is slow, wants to find expensive or costly queries, mentions a performance regression, or wants to compare performance over time or find bottleneck tasks. Do NOT use it for data quality issues (the prevent skill), storage cost questions (the storage-cost-analysis skill), creating monitors (the monitoring-advisor skill), or just querying or exploring table contents.
Inputs and outputs
Input is a performance question - a specific job, pipeline, or table, or a general "what's slow" discovery request - optionally scoped to a platform (Airflow, dbt, Databricks) or query type (read or write). Output is a structured finding: a problem summary with exact numbers, a root cause (what changed), the downstream impact, and specific recommended actions.
Integrations
Calls Monte Carlo's cross-platform observability tools exclusively through the plugin's bundled MCP server using fully-qualified tool names, never a separately-configured monte-carlo-mcp server in the same session, and works across Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouse query engines without needing separate platform-specific tooling.
Who it's for
Data engineers troubleshooting slow pipelines, expensive queries, or performance regressions who want a structured, numbers-quoted root-cause investigation across their orchestration and warehouse stack rather than manually correlating job logs, query history, and lineage by hand.
Source README
Monte Carlo Performance Diagnosis Skill
This skill helps diagnose data pipeline performance issues using Monte Carlo's cross-platform observability data. It works across Airflow, dbt, Databricks, and warehouse query engines to find bottlenecks, detect regressions, and identify root causes.
Monte Carlo tool routing (required): Always call Monte Carlo MCP tools through this plugin's
bundled server, whose fully-qualified tool names aremcp__plugin_mc-agent-toolkit_monte-carlo-mcp__<tool>(e.g.mcp__plugin_mc-agent-toolkit_monte-carlo-mcp__get_alerts). Bare tool names used in this skill
(get_alerts,search,get_table, …) refer to that bundled server. If the session also has a
separately-configuredmonte-carlo-mcpserver, do not route to it - it may point at a
different endpoint or credentials.
Reference files live next to this skill file. Use the Read tool (not MCP resources) to access them:
- Tiered investigation approach:
references/investigation-tiers.md(relative to this file) - Query analysis patterns:
references/query-analysis.md(relative to this file)
When to activate this skill
Activate when the user:
- Asks about slow pipelines, jobs, or queries
- Wants to find expensive or costly queries
- Mentions performance regressions or degradation
- Asks "why is this pipeline slow?" or "what's using the most compute?"
- Wants to compare performance over time or find bottleneck tasks
- Asks about failed or futile query patterns
When NOT to activate this skill
Do not activate when the user is:
- Investigating data quality issues (use the prevent skill)
- Looking at storage costs (use the storage-cost-analysis skill)
- Creating monitors (use the monitoring-advisor skill)
- Just querying data or exploring table contents
Prerequisites
The following MCP tools must be available (connect to Monte Carlo's MCP server):
Discovery tools (Tier 1):
get_jobs_performance-- find slow/failing jobs across Airflow, dbt, Databricksget_top_slow_queries-- find slowest query groups by total runtime
Bridge tool:
get_tables_for_job-- convert job MCONs to table MCONs
Diagnosis tools (Tier 2):
get_tasks_performance-- drill into a job's individual tasksget_change_timeline-- unified timeline of query changes, volume shifts, Airflow/dbt failuresget_query_rca-- root cause analysis for failed/futile queriesget_query_latency_distribution-- latency trend over timeget_asset_lineage-- trace upstream/downstream impact
Supporting tools:
get_warehouses-- list available warehouses
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the scope
Determine what the user wants to investigate:
- Specific job/pipeline: User mentions a job name or pipeline
- Specific table: User mentions a table that's slow to update
- General discovery: User wants to find what's slow
Call get_warehouses to list available warehouses. Match the user's context to a warehouse.
Step 2: Tier 1 -- Discovery
If you don't have specific MCONs to investigate, start with discovery:
Find slow jobs: Call
get_jobs_performancewith optionalintegration_typefilter (AIRFLOW, DATABRICKS, DBT) if the user specifies a platform.- Results include: job name, average duration, trend (7-day), run count, failure rate
- Look for: high
avgDuration, negativerunDurationTrend7d, high failure rates
Find expensive queries: Call
get_top_slow_querieswith optionalwarehouse_idandquery_type("read" for SELECTs, "write" for INSERT/CREATE/MERGE).- Results include: query hash, total runtime, average runtime, run count
- Look for: queries with high total runtime or high individual execution time
Present the top findings to the user before drilling deeper. A typical investigation needs only 3-7 tool calls.
If both discovery tools return no results: Tell the user no performance issues were found in the current time window. Suggest broadening the scope (different warehouse, longer time range, or a different platform filter).
Step 3: Bridge -- Job to Tables
After Tier 1 identifies problematic jobs, convert to table MCONs:
Call get_tables_for_job(job_mcon=..., integration_type=...) using the integration_type from the job performance results.
This gives you the table MCONs needed for Tier 2 investigation.
Step 4: Tier 2 -- Diagnosis
Now drill into root causes using the MCONs from discovery or the bridge:
Task bottleneck: Call
get_tasks_performanceto find which specific task in a job is the bottleneck.What changed? Call
get_change_timeline-- this is your most powerful tool. It returns a unified timeline of:- Query text changes (schema modifications, new JOINs, filter changes)
- Volume shifts (row count spikes/drops)
- Airflow task failures
- dbt model failures
All in one call. Look for correlations: "query changed on day X, runtime doubled on day X+1."
Why are queries failing? Call
get_query_rcato get root cause analysis:- Failed queries: errors, timeouts, permission issues
- Futile queries: queries that run but produce no useful output
- Patterns are pre-computed -- the tool groups failures by cause
Is latency degrading? Call
get_query_latency_distributionto see the trend:- Compare p50 vs p95 -- if p95 >> p50 (>5x), the problem is outlier queries
- Look for step-changes in latency (sudden increase = regression)
- For step-change / regression-time-localization use cases, pass
bucket="1h". The default downsamples to daily on windows ≥ 3 days, which hides hour-level steps.
Trace impact: Call
get_asset_lineagewithdirection="DOWNSTREAM"to see what's affected by a slow table, ordirection="UPSTREAM"to find what feeds it.
Step 5: Present findings
Structure your response as:
- Problem summary: What's slow and by how much (with exact numbers from tools)
- Root cause: What changed or what's causing the issue
- Impact: What downstream systems are affected
- Recommendations: Specific actions to fix the issue
Important rules
- Quote tool numbers exactly. If a tool returns "1282 runs, avg 22.5s", say exactly that. Never round, estimate, or fabricate numbers.
- Always compare to baselines. Use 7-day trend data (
runDurationTrend7d) to distinguish regressions from normal variance. Flag if trend data has less than 0.1 confidence. - Stop when you have a root cause. 3-7 tool calls is typical. More than 10 means you're over-investigating.
- Read vs write queries: When the user asks about "reads" or "read queries", filter with
query_type="read". When they ask about "writes", usequery_type="write". Do NOT mix them. - Never expose MCONs, UUIDs, or internal identifiers to the user. Use human-readable names.
- Cross-platform: This skill works across Airflow, dbt, and Databricks. Note which platform each finding comes from.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.