Instrument Production Code with Observability Telemetry
A 7-step process for instrumenting production code with structured logs, RED/USE metrics, tracing, and symptom-based alerts.
Why it matters
Add comprehensive observability instrumentation to production features so on-call engineers can diagnose incidents quickly by querying structured logs, metrics, and distributed traces instead of guessing what went wrong.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Generate structured logging with stable event names, correlation IDs, and machine-readable fields for every significant business event and error
Instrument RED metrics (rate, errors, duration) on endpoints and USE metrics (utilization, saturation, errors) on resources with proper cardinality control
Add OpenTelemetry distributed tracing with auto-instrumentation and manual spans around meaningful units of work across service boundaries
Create symptom-based alerts with actionable thresholds, runbook links, and verification steps that page only when users are actually impacted
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-observability-and-instrumentation | bash Overview
Observability and Instrumentation
This skill provides a 7-step process for instrumenting production code: defining on-call questions, choosing logs/metrics/traces per question, structured logging with correlation IDs, RED/USE metrics with bounded cardinality, OpenTelemetry tracing, and symptom-based alerting. Use it when building any production feature, adding I/O/retries/queues/cross-service calls, after a hard-to-diagnose incident, or reviewing alerting rules. Not for live incident debugging, performance profiling, or launch-day rollback checklists - those are separate skills.
What it does
A 7-step observability and instrumentation process built on the premise that instrumentation belongs alongside the feature, not after launch. Step 1 forces writing down 2-4 concrete questions an on-call engineer will ask about the feature before adding any telemetry - if you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument. Step 2 picks the right signal per question: structured logs answer what happened in a specific case, metrics answer how often or how fast in aggregate, traces answer where time went across services - metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why. Step 3 covers structured logging: every line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields (never string interpolation), a four-level severity scale (error/warn/info/debug) mapped to specific on-call actions, mandatory correlation/request IDs generated at the system boundary and propagated to every log line and span, and a hard rule against logging secrets, tokens, or full PII. Step 4 covers metrics: RED (Rate, Errors, Duration) for request-driven services and USE (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) for resources, via the vendor-neutral OpenTelemetry metrics API (Prometheus' prom-client shown as one example backend), with cardinality as the named failure mode - labels must come from small fixed sets like route templates or status classes, never user IDs or raw URLs - and latency tracked as histograms with p50/p95/p99, never a plain average. Step 5 covers distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry's auto-instrumentation for HTTP/gRPC/DB clients, manual spans only around meaningful internal work, context propagated across every async boundary or the trace breaks, and head-based sampling at a low rate with 100% of errors kept if the backend supports tail sampling. Step 6 covers alerting: alert on symptoms users feel (error rate, p99 latency, queue age) rather than causes (CPU, one pod restart), with four rules for every alert - it must be actionable, it links to a runbook, its threshold is justified by an SLO or historical data rather than a guess, and only two severities exist (page for user-facing issues needing action now, ticket for degradation this week), since a third tier becomes noise. Step 7 verifies the telemetry itself before calling the work done - forcing a staging error and finding it in logs by request ID, sending test traffic to confirm metric labels and values, following one request across services with no broken spans, and test-firing every new alert to confirm it reaches the right channel with a working runbook link.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use it when building any feature that will run in production, adding a service, endpoint, background job, or external integration, after a production incident took too long to diagnose, when setting up or reviewing alerting rules, or reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls. Do NOT use it for diagnosing a failure happening right now (that's the debugging-and-error-recovery skill, which this instrumentation is what makes fast next time), profiling and optimizing already-measured slowness (the performance-optimization skill), or launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers (the shipping-and-launch skill, which this instrumentation feeds).
Inputs and outputs
Input is a feature or PR that will run in production, plus the on-call questions it should answer. Output is structured, correlation-ID'd logging; RED/USE metrics with bounded label sets and percentile latency; distributed traces with propagated context; and symptom-based, runbook-linked alerts - each verified by triggering the actual path and inspecting the telemetry it produces.
Integrations
Uses the OpenTelemetry API as the vendor-neutral standard for both metrics and tracing (with Prometheus' prom-client shown as one example metrics backend), plus a structured JSON logger with request-scoped child loggers for correlation IDs.
Who it's for
Developers and reviewers who want production features to be diagnosable from telemetry alone - answering an on-call engineer's questions from logs, metrics, and traces rather than guesswork - and who want a concrete process and verification checklist rather than a vague "add some logging" instruction.
Source README
Observability and Instrumentation
Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on - it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production
- Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
- A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
- Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
- Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
NOT for:
- Diagnosing a failure happening right now - use the
debugging-and-error-recoveryskill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness - use the
performance-optimizationskill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers - see the
shipping-and-launchskill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
Process
1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2-4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument - you'll log everything and learn nothing.
2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured log | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | payment_failed with provider error code |
| Metric | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls |
| Trace | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.
3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
event: 'payment_failed',
paymentId: id,
provider: 'stripe',
errorCode: err.code,
attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');
Log levels - use them consistently:
| Level | Meaning | On-call action |
|---|---|---|
error |
Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate |
warn |
Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends |
info |
Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None |
debug |
Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
next();
});
Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill - telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client - one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({
name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
help: 'HTTP request duration',
labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200'
buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});
Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels - that belongs in logs and traces.
OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe"
NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text
Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry - it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({
serviceName: 'checkout-service',
instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();
Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary - HTTP headers, queue message metadata - or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
6. Alerting
Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:
SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min disk at 70%
Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
- It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
- It links to a runbook - even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
- It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
- Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by
requestId, confirm fields are structured (not[object Object]) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
- Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
- Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. |
| "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. |
| "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. |
| "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. |
| "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. |
| "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. |
| "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
- Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
- No correlation/request ID - each log line is an orphan
- Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
- Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
- Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
- Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
- Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
- "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
- All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
- No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
- RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
- Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
- A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
- Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
- An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see references/observability-checklist.md.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.