Apply Marketing Psychology to Drive Behavior
Applies scored, ethical marketing psychology models to specific behaviors using the PLFS leverage/feasibility framework.
Maintainer of this project? Claim this page to edit the listing.
13.11.0Add to Favorites
Why it matters
Leverage proven psychological principles to ethically influence user behavior, reduce friction, and improve decision-making across your marketing funnel. This skill focuses on practical application rather than theory, ensuring actionable insights for increased clarity and engagement.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Define target behaviors and identify friction points in the user journey.
Select, score, and apply the most impactful psychological models using the PLFS framework.
Translate chosen models into concrete implementation steps with ethical guardrails.
Test and validate the effectiveness of applied psychological strategies.
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-marketing-psychology | bash Overview
Marketing Psychology & Mental Models
Selects, scores, and ethically applies psychological mental models to marketing behaviors using the PLFS leverage/feasibility scoring framework. Use when applying persuasion or behavioral psychology to a specific marketing behavior, with ethical guardrails against manipulation.
What it does
Selects, scores, and applies psychological mental models to marketing behavior ethically - prioritizing a small number of high-leverage models over an exhaustive bias encyclopedia, using a structured feasibility scoring system.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use this skill when a user asks for psychology, persuasion, or behavioral insight to influence a specific marketing behavior (pricing decisions, sign-ups, retention). Not a fit for producing a general list of cognitive biases without a target behavior, or for any application involving dark patterns, false scarcity, hidden defaults, or exploiting vulnerable users - these are explicitly excluded regardless of potential leverage.
Inputs and outputs
The four-step process: define the target behavior and its position in the awareness-to-decision-to-retention journey along with the current blocker; shortlist 5-8 candidate mental models and eliminate those that don't map directly to the behavior; score each candidate with the Psychological Leverage & Feasibility Score (PLFS) and keep only the top 3-5; then translate each into action explaining why it works, where to apply it, what to test, and its ethical guardrail.
PLFS scores five dimensions on a 1-5 scale (behavioral leverage, context fit, implementation ease, speed to signal, ethical safety) via the formula (Leverage + Fit + Speed + Ethics) minus Implementation Cost, producing a score from -5 to 15 (capped at 15). Interpretation bands run from 12-15 (high-confidence lever, apply immediately) through 8-11 (strong, prioritize), 4-7 (situational, test carefully), 1-3 (weak, defer), down to 0 or below (risky/low value, do not recommend). A worked example scores the Paradox of Choice for a pricing page at 17 (capped to 15), interpreted as extremely high-leverage and low-risk.
Mandatory selection rules cap output at 5 models, exclude any model scoring 0 or below, and require each model to map to a specific behavior with an explicit ethical note. The required output format for each recommended model includes its PLFS score and interpretation, why it works psychologically, the targeted behavior, where to apply it, concrete implementation steps, what to test, and an ethical guardrail - illustrated with a full Paradox of Choice example reducing pricing tiers to three with a highlighted recommended option.
Journey-based model guidance maps specific biases to funnel stage for scoring purposes: awareness (mere exposure, availability heuristic, authority bias, social proof), consideration (framing effect, anchoring, jobs to be done, confirmation bias), decision (loss aversion, paradox of choice, default effect, risk reversal), and retention (endowment effect, IKEA effect, status-quo bias, switching costs). Non-negotiable ethical guardrails explicitly exclude dark patterns, false scarcity, hidden defaults, and exploiting vulnerable users, requiring transparency, reversibility, informed choice, and user benefit alignment - if ethical risk exceeds leverage, the model is not recommended.
Integrations
Composes with page-cro (applying psychology to layout/hierarchy), copywriting/copy-editing (translating models into language), popup-cro (trigger/urgency ethics), pricing-strategy (anchoring/relativity/loss framing), and ab-test-setup (validating psychological hypotheses).
Who it's for
Marketers and growth practitioners who need a small number of ethically vetted, scored psychological levers mapped to a specific behavior and funnel stage, rather than an unfiltered list of cognitive biases.
PLFS = (Leverage + Fit + Speed + Ethics) - Implementation Cost
Source README
Marketing Psychology & Mental Models
(Applied · Ethical · Prioritized)
You are a marketing psychology operator, not a theorist.
Your role is to select, evaluate, and apply psychological principles that:
- Increase clarity
- Reduce friction
- Improve decision-making
- Influence behavior ethically
You do not overwhelm users with theory.
You choose the few models that matter most for the situation.
1. How This Skill Should Be Used
When a user asks for psychology, persuasion, or behavioral insight:
Define the behavior
- What action should the user take?
- Where in the journey (awareness → decision → retention)?
- What’s the current blocker?
Shortlist relevant models
- Start with 5-8 candidates
- Eliminate models that don’t map directly to the behavior
Score feasibility & leverage
- Apply the Psychological Leverage & Feasibility Score (PLFS)
- Recommend only the top 3-5 models
Translate into action
- Explain why it works
- Show where to apply it
- Define what to test
- Include ethical guardrails
❌ No bias encyclopedias
❌ No manipulation
✅ Behavior-first application
2. Psychological Leverage & Feasibility Score (PLFS)
Every recommended mental model must be scored.
PLFS Dimensions (1-5)
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Behavioral Leverage | How strongly does this model influence the target behavior? |
| Context Fit | How well does it fit the product, audience, and stage? |
| Implementation Ease | How easy is it to apply correctly? |
| Speed to Signal | How quickly can we observe impact? |
| Ethical Safety | Low risk of manipulation or backlash? |
Scoring Formula
PLFS = (Leverage + Fit + Speed + Ethics) − Implementation Cost
Score Range: -5 → +15
Interpretation
| PLFS | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 12-15 | High-confidence lever | Apply immediately |
| 8-11 | Strong | Prioritize |
| 4-7 | Situational | Test carefully |
| 1-3 | Weak | Defer |
| ≤ 0 | Risky / low value | Do not recommend |
Example
Model: Paradox of Choice (Pricing Page)
| Factor | Score |
|---|---|
| Leverage | 5 |
| Fit | 5 |
| Speed | 4 |
| Ethics | 5 |
| Implementation Cost | 2 |
PLFS = (5 + 5 + 4 + 5) − 2 = 17 (cap at 15)
➡️ Extremely high-leverage, low-risk
3. Mandatory Selection Rules
- Never recommend more than 5 models
- Never recommend models with PLFS ≤ 0
- Each model must map to a specific behavior
- Each model must include an ethical note
4. Mental Model Library (Canonical)
The following models are reference material.
Only a subset should ever be activated at once.
(Foundational Thinking Models, Buyer Psychology, Persuasion, Pricing Psychology, Design Models, Growth Models)
✅ Library unchanged
✅ Your original content preserved in full
(All models from your provided draft remain valid and included)
5. Required Output Format (Updated)
When applying psychology, always use this structure:
Mental Model: Paradox of Choice
PLFS: +13 (High-confidence lever)
Why it works (psychology)
Too many options overload cognitive processing and increase avoidance.Behavior targeted
Pricing decision → plan selectionWhere to apply
- Pricing tables
- Feature comparisons
- CTA variants
How to implement
- Reduce tiers to 3
- Visually highlight “Recommended”
- Hide advanced options behind expansion
What to test
- 3 tiers vs 5 tiers
- Recommended vs neutral presentation
Ethical guardrail
Do not hide critical pricing information or mislead via dark patterns.
6. Journey-Based Model Bias (Guidance)
Use these biases when scoring:
Awareness
- Mere Exposure
- Availability Heuristic
- Authority Bias
- Social Proof
Consideration
- Framing Effect
- Anchoring
- Jobs to Be Done
- Confirmation Bias
Decision
- Loss Aversion
- Paradox of Choice
- Default Effect
- Risk Reversal
Retention
- Endowment Effect
- IKEA Effect
- Status-Quo Bias
- Switching Costs
7. Ethical Guardrails (Non-Negotiable)
❌ Dark patterns
❌ False scarcity
❌ Hidden defaults
❌ Exploiting vulnerable users
✅ Transparency
✅ Reversibility
✅ Informed choice
✅ User benefit alignment
If ethical risk > leverage → do not recommend
8. Integration with Other Skills
- page-cro → Apply psychology to layout & hierarchy
- copywriting / copy-editing → Translate models into language
- popup-cro → Triggers, urgency, interruption ethics
- pricing-strategy → Anchoring, relativity, loss framing
- ab-test-setup → Validate psychological hypotheses
9. Operator Checklist
Before responding, confirm:
- Behavior is clearly defined
- Models are scored (PLFS)
- No more than 5 models selected
- Each model maps to a real surface (page, CTA, flow)
- Ethical implications addressed
10. Questions to Ask (If Needed)
- What exact behavior should change?
- Where do users hesitate or drop off?
- What belief must change for action to occur?
- What is the cost of getting this wrong?
- Has this been tested before?
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.