Skill

Audit Local SEO for Legal Services

Skill for auditing local SEO for law firms and forensic experts - GBP, E-E-A-T/YMYL trust signals, and directory citations.


81
Spark score
out of 100
Updated last month
Version 13.1.1

Add to Favorites

Why it matters

Enhance the local online visibility of law firms and legal professionals by conducting a comprehensive SEO audit focused on Google Business Profile, E-E-A-T signals, and on-page optimization.

Outcomes

What it gets done

01

Analyze Google Business Profile completeness and review strategy.

02

Evaluate E-E-A-T signals for trustworthiness and expertise.

03

Audit practice area and location page optimization.

04

Assess technical SEO factors impacting local rankings.

Install

Add it to your toolbox

Run in your project directory:

curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-local-legal-seo-audit | bash

Overview

Local Legal SEO Audit

A local-SEO audit skill scoped to law firms, attorneys, and forensic experts, prioritizing Google Business Profile, YMYL E-E-A-T trust signals, practice-area/location pages, and legal-directory citation consistency, output as a structured findings report with a prioritized action plan. Use for local SEO audits of legal/professional services sites targeting local pack or directory visibility. Use seo-audit for general non-legal checks and seo-forensic-incident-response for ranking-drop investigations instead.

What it does

Local Legal SEO Audit is a skill scoped specifically to legal and professional services sites - law firms, attorneys, forensic experts, legal consultants - where trust signals, local authority, E-E-A-T, and directory presence are the primary ranking levers rather than generic technical SEO. It opens with an initial-assessment phase gathering practice area, firm size, single vs. multi-location, current Google local pack visibility, existing Google Business Profile and directory listings, and the client's goals (calls, form fills, ranking for specific case types, or building expert-witness authority).

Its audit framework is prioritized specifically for legal/forensic sites: Google Business Profile and local pack first (highest impact for local queries), then E-E-A-T and trust signals (legal sites fall under Google's YMYL - Your Money or Your Life - classification, so these are heavily weighted), then on-page optimization, technical foundations, directory/citation consistency, content strategy, and reviews/reputation last. The GBP audit checks profile completeness (exact name match, correct primary/secondary categories, service area, hours, Q&A), photos, review count/rating/response rate versus competitors, and posting cadence. The E-E-A-T audit is broken into the four components: Experience (documented case history, expert-witness court appearances), Expertise (bar registration number, academic credentials, publications), Authoritativeness (external citations, directory listings, media mentions), and Trustworthiness (verifiable address, HTTPS, no outcome-guarantee claims, legal disclaimers).

On-page checks cover dedicated practice-area pages (one per specialty, primary keyword in title/H1/URL, LegalService schema), location pages for multi-city firms (unique content per city, embedded map, consistent NAP, no copy-paste duplication), homepage trust signals above the fold, and a legal-specific title tag format ([Service] em [City] | [Firm Name]). Technical checks focus on mobile click-to-call prominence, Core Web Vitals thresholds (LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms), crawlability, and clean URL structure. The directory/citation audit lists core legal directories for Brazil (OAB, Jusbrasil, Escavador, ORCID) and internationally (Avvo, FindLaw, Justia, Martindale-Hubbell), plus general citation sources, checked for NAP consistency and duplicate-listing cleanup. Content strategy covers FAQ pages targeting long-tail question queries with FAQ schema, practice-area topic-cluster blog articles with credentialed author bylines, and forensic-expert-specific content (case-type explainers, expert-witness process descriptions, published-research summaries).

Output format:
Executive Summary -> GBP Findings -> E-E-A-T & Trust Findings -> On-Page Findings ->
Technical Findings -> Directory & Citation Findings -> Prioritized Action Plan
(Critical / High impact / Quick wins / Long-term)

Each finding is reported as Issue / Impact (High/Medium/Low) / Fix, rolling up into a prioritized action plan from critical blockers (missing GBP, no HTTPS, no practice-area pages) through long-term content and link-building work.

When to use - and when NOT to

Use this skill when auditing or improving local SEO for a law firm, attorney, forensic expert, or similar legal/professional services website, or when the goal is visibility in Google's local pack, legal directories, or local organic results for specific practice areas or cities.

Do not use it for a general SEO health check outside the legal/local context (use seo-audit instead), or for investigating a sudden traffic or rankings crash (use seo-forensic-incident-response instead).

Inputs and outputs

Inputs: the firm's practice area, location(s), current GBP and directory presence, review count and competitors, and existing site structure (practice-area and location pages).

Outputs: a structured audit report (Executive Summary, GBP/E-E-A-T/On-Page/Technical/Directory findings each with Issue/Impact/Fix, and a prioritized action plan from critical to long-term).

Integrations

Hands off to schema-markup for LegalService/Attorney/FAQ structured data, seo-audit for general non-legal SEO checks, seo-forensic-incident-response for ranking-drop investigations, ai-seo for AI-search and featured-snippet optimization, and page-cro for conversion-rate work on practice-area and contact pages.

Who it's for

SEO practitioners and legal marketers auditing or improving local search visibility for law firms, attorneys, and forensic experts.

FAQ

Common questions

Discussion

Questions & comments · 0

Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.