Skill

Orchestrate Grok Build CLI for headless code implementation

Orchestrates delegating well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI headlessly, with a mandatory diff review gate.

Works with grokxaigit

91
Spark score
out of 100
Updated 16 days ago
Version 1.2.0

Add to Favorites

Why it matters

Delegate well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly while maintaining control over planning, specification, diff review, and final acceptance, enabling fast execution of boilerplate, scaffolding, tests, and mechanical refactors without surrendering architectural decisions or security-sensitive work.

Outcomes

What it gets done

01

Write self-contained task specifications and dispatch them to Grok Build CLI with proper safety gates

02

Review every diff produced by Grok against acceptance criteria before committing changes

03

Execute Markdown implementation plans task-by-task with clean state management and git workflow

04

Handle failures, retries, and fallbacks while preserving diffs for user review and recovery decisions

Install

Add it to your toolbox

Run in your project directory:

curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-grok-build | bash

Overview

Grok Build Orchestration

Orchestrates delegating well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI headlessly: writes a self-contained spec, dispatches with --always-approve, then runs a mandatory diff review and acceptance check before committing. Use it for plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria, boilerplate, or mechanical refactors. Keep architecture decisions, security-sensitive code, and production-infrastructure work with the orchestrator instead.

What it does

Orchestrates delegating well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly: the coding assistant plans, writes self-contained task specs, dispatches them to Grok Build, reviews every diff, and owns the final result, while Grok itself is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors live in references/cli.md.

When to use - and when NOT to

Use it when delegating a well-specified implementation task to Grok Build headlessly, when executing a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task with a diff review after each task, or when the user says "use grok," "grok build," "have grok implement," or "send to grok." Delegate to Grok: plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria, boilerplate/scaffolding/CRUD, mechanical refactors, test writing from clear specs, and UI components from mockups or specs. Keep with the orchestrator instead: ambiguous requirements and architecture decisions, deep cross-file debugging, security-sensitive code, anything touching production infrastructure, and any task where writing the spec is basically equivalent to doing the work - when in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator. Before every dispatch, show the user the exact task specification that will be sent to xAI, the target worktree, and the permission mode, and get explicit approval to disclose that text and let Grok edit the scoped worktree; never include secrets, proprietary source, customer data, or credentials in a task specification, and never run grok update, --always-approve, or a destructive recovery command without separate, explicit approval.

Inputs and outputs

Session preflight runs once before the first dispatch: grok update --check --json (tell the user if updateAvailable is true, and only run grok update after explicit approval, confirming with grok --version), then grok models (if it errors or reports logged out, stop and ask the user to run grok login). The default per-task loop is sequential: write a self-contained task spec to a temp directory outside the target repo (Grok has zero conversation context, so no one-liner prompts, ever); ensure clean state with no uncommitted source changes so the post-run diff is exactly Grok's work; then dispatch:

grok --prompt-file <task-file> \
  --output-format json \
  --always-approve \
  --max-turns 30 \
  --cwd <repo>

parsing the JSON output and saving sessionId (--always-approve is required for headless runs, since --permission-mode acceptEdits silently cancels edits with no interactive approver, and should only be used after explicit approval for that exact scoped worktree; add --check for a high-stakes task so Grok self-verifies first, at roughly double the latency). The review gate is non-negotiable: read the diff yourself, run the acceptance commands from the spec, commit with a clear message on pass, and on failure ask the user before any fix-up or reset - never run git checkout -- . or git clean -fd automatically. The task spec itself follows a fixed template with Task, Context, Files, Task description, Constraints, and Acceptance criteria sections. Default model is grok-4.5, with -m grok-composer-2.5-fast reserved for trivial mechanical tasks only.

Integrations

Executing a Markdown implementation plan dispatches one plan task at a time in order, checking off the plan's task checkboxes (- [ ] to - [x]) as each task lands and passes the review gate; only when a plan explicitly marks tasks independent does parallel dispatch apply, using --worktree=<task-slug> per task, running concurrently, then reviewing and merging one worktree at a time through the same review gate - merge conflicts usually eat the savings, so sequential remains the preferred default. Failure handling: a cancelled, empty, or diff-less result usually means a missing --always-approve, retry with it; a CLI error or timeout gets one retry, then the orchestrator does the task itself and notes the fallback; an expired auth means stop and ask the user to run grok login; two exhausted fix-up rounds mean preserving the diff and asking the user for a recovery decision; and a dirty tree at dispatch time is refused outright, requiring a commit or stash first. As a third-party service, Grok should never receive secrets, proprietary material, personal data, or customer data, and --always-approve must stay limited to a clean, explicitly approved worktree and never substitute for the orchestrator's own review - the skill does not authorize installations, updates, commits, pushes, deployments, or destructive cleanup on its own.

Who it's for

Coding orchestrators and developers who want to hand well-scoped implementation tasks to a fast, cheap headless executor while keeping architecture decisions, security-sensitive code, and final diff review firmly with a human or the orchestrating agent.

Source README

Grok Build Orchestration

When to Use

  • Use when delegating a well-specified implementation task to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly
  • Use when executing a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task with a diff review after each task
  • Use when the user says "use grok", "grok build", "have grok implement", or "send to grok"

The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs,
dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result.
Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: references/cli.md.

Safety Gate

Before every dispatch, show the user the exact task specification that will be sent to xAI,
the target worktree, and the permission mode. Obtain explicit approval to disclose that text
and to let Grok edit the scoped worktree. Never include secrets, proprietary source, customer
data, or credentials in a task specification. Do not run grok update, --always-approve,
or a destructive recovery command without separate, explicit approval.

When to delegate vs keep with the orchestrator

Delegate to Grok Keep with the orchestrator
Plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria Ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions
Boilerplate, scaffolding, CRUD Deep cross-file debugging
Mechanical refactors Security-sensitive code
Test writing from clear specs Anything touching production infrastructure
UI components from mockups/specs Tasks where writing the spec ≈ doing the work

When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.

Session preflight (once, before the first dispatch)

  1. grok update --check --json - if updateAvailable is true, tell the user. Run
    grok update only after explicit approval, then confirm with grok --version.
  2. grok models - if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to run
    grok login.

Per-task loop (sequential - the default)

  1. Spec. Write a self-contained task file (template below) to a temp directory
    OUTSIDE the target repo - the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS
    temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context:
    no one-liner prompts, ever.

    • POSIX: mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs", then write task.md there.
    • Windows (PowerShell): New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs",
      then write task.md there.
  2. Clean state. No uncommitted source changes - commit or stash first, so the
    post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (__pycache__, dist/,
    etc.); if they show in git status, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your
    concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree.

  3. Dispatch.

    POSIX:

    grok --prompt-file <task-file> \
      --output-format json \
      --always-approve \
      --max-turns 30 \
      --cwd <repo>
    

    Windows (PowerShell) - backtick line-continuation:

    grok --prompt-file <task-file> `
      --output-format json `
      --always-approve `
      --max-turns 30 `
      --cwd <repo>
    

    Parse the JSON output and save sessionId. (--always-approve is required for
    headless runs - --permission-mode acceptEdits silently cancels edits with no
    interactive approver. Use it only after the user explicitly approves Grok editing this
    exact scoped worktree. See references/cli.md.) For a high-stakes task, add --check
    so Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency).

  4. Review gate - non-negotiable.

    • Read the diff yourself (git diff -- <files from the spec> to skip artifact noise):
      does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions?
    • Run the acceptance commands from the spec.
    • Pass → commit with a clear message following the repo's convention → next task.
    • Fail → ask the user before a fix-up or any reset. Never run git checkout -- . or
      git clean -fd automatically; preserve the diff for review and use a non-destructive
      recovery plan unless the user explicitly authorizes otherwise.

Task spec template

### Task: <one-line title>

### Context
- Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>
- Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>

### Files
- Modify: <path>
- Create: <path>

### Task
<precise description of the change>

### Constraints
- Do not modify any files other than those listed above.
- <other constraints>

### Acceptance criteria
- `<exact command>` <expected result>

Executing a Markdown implementation plan

  • One plan task per dispatch, in order.
  • Check off the plan's task checkboxes (- [ ]- [x]) as each task lands and passes
    the review gate.
  • If the plan explicitly marks tasks as independent, see Parallel dispatch below;
    otherwise stay sequential.

Parallel dispatch (opt-in exception, not the default)

Only when a plan explicitly marks tasks independent: dispatch each with
--worktree=<task-slug>, run concurrently, then review and merge one worktree at a
time through the same review gate. Merge conflicts usually eat the savings - prefer
sequential.

Failure handling

Failure Action
stopReason: "Cancelled", empty text, no diff Missing --always-approve - retry with it
CLI error / timeout Retry once; then do the task yourself and note the fallback
Auth expired Stop; ask the user to run grok login
2 fix-up rounds exhausted Preserve the diff, ask the user for a recovery decision, then finish the task manually if authorized
Dirty tree at dispatch Refuse; commit/stash first

Limitations

  • Grok receives the approved task specification; it is a third-party service and should not
    receive secrets, proprietary material, personal data, or customer data.
  • --always-approve allows edits without an interactive approval prompt. It must be limited to
    a clean, explicitly approved worktree and never substitutes for the orchestrator's review.
  • Model output can be incorrect, insecure, incomplete, or out of scope. Review the diff and
    run the acceptance checks before accepting any change.
  • This skill does not authorize installations, updates, commits, pushes, deployments, or
    destructive cleanup.

Models

Default grok-4.5. Add -m grok-composer-2.5-fast only for trivial mechanical tasks.

Discussion

Questions & comments · 0

Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.