Apply pragmatic functional programming patterns in TypeScript
80/20 pragmatic guide to fp-ts: five core patterns worth learning, and an explicit judgment call for when NOT to use FP at all.
Maintainer of this project? Claim this page to edit the listing.
13.6.1Add to Favorites
Why it matters
Help developers adopt functional programming patterns in TypeScript without academic overhead, focusing on the 80/20 of patterns that improve code readability and error handling in real-world applications.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Chain operations clearly using pipe instead of nested function calls or throwaway variables
Handle missing values with Option to eliminate repetitive null checks
Make errors explicit using Either to return failures as values instead of throwing exceptions
Guide when to skip FP patterns in favor of simpler imperative code for readability and performance
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/ag-fp-pragmatic | bash Overview
Pragmatic Functional Programming
An 80/20 pragmatic guide to fp-ts covering five core patterns worth learning and explicit guidance on when functional programming style should be skipped. Use as a starting point for adopting fp-ts pragmatically, or when judging whether a piece of TypeScript code actually benefits from FP style.
What it does
Pragmatic Functional Programming is an 80/20 entry point to fp-ts built around one golden rule: if functional programming makes code harder to read, don't use it - FP is a tool, not a religion. It identifies five patterns that deliver most of the benefit - pipe for chaining 3+ transformations in reading order, Option for nullable chains without cascading null checks, Either for making failure explicit instead of throwing, map for transforming values inside a container without unpacking them, and flatMap for chaining operations that might each fail - and explicitly tells the reader to master these before exploring anything else.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use it as a pragmatic starting point for fp-ts in TypeScript, or for an exploratory/educational 80/20 view of what's actually worth adopting versus academic functional-programming theory. It devotes an entire section to when NOT to use FP: simple null checks are better served by native optional chaining (user?.address?.city ?? 'Unknown') than an Option chain, a plain for loop beats forcing A.findFirst/O.toNullable when early exit or complex logic is involved, performance-critical hot paths favor imperative code over fp-ts's intermediate-array-creating combinators, and any pattern the team can't read is bad code regardless of theoretical elegance - "if you're the only one who can read the code, it's not good code."
Inputs and outputs
Its "quick wins" section gives concrete before/after refactors: nested ternaries become pipe plus O.fold, scattered try/catch becomes one E.tryCatch plus E.getOrElse, functions returning undefined become functions returning Option (forcing callers to handle the missing case), plain error strings become structured typed errors, and hand-rolled error variants become tagged unions ({ _tag: 'NotFound' as const, id }) matched with a switch. The readability rule is illustrated directly: a "too clever" one-liner chaining flow/prop/equals/monoid is shown next to both a plain imperative version and a "middle ground" pipe version, with guidance to prefer whichever a junior developer would actually understand.
const getUserCity = (user: User | null): string =>
pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)
Integrations
Built on fp-ts's Option, Either, Array, and function (pipe) modules for the core patterns, with a cheat-sheet table translating each fp-ts call into plain language, and pointers toward TaskEither, the validation applicative, Reader, and Do-notation as the next tier once these five patterns feel natural.
Who it's for
TypeScript developers deciding whether and how much functional-programming style to adopt in a real codebase - especially teams new to fp-ts who need a judgment framework for when FP genuinely improves a piece of code versus when it's over-engineering a simple null check or loop.
Source README
Pragmatic Functional Programming
Read this first. This guide cuts through the academic jargon and shows you what actually matters. No category theory. No abstract nonsense. Just patterns that make your code better.
When to Use
- You want a pragmatic starting point for fp-ts or functional programming in TypeScript.
- The task is exploratory or educational and needs an 80/20 view of what is actually worth adopting.
- You need guidance on when FP helps and when it is better to keep code simple.
The Golden Rule
If functional programming makes your code harder to read, don't use it.
FP is a tool, not a religion. Use it when it helps. Skip it when it doesn't.
The 80/20 of FP
These five patterns give you most of the benefits. Master these before exploring anything else.
1. Pipe: Chain Operations Clearly
Instead of nesting function calls or creating intermediate variables, chain operations in reading order.
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Hard to read (inside-out)
const result = format(validate(parse(input)))
// Before: Too many variables
const parsed = parse(input)
const validated = validate(parsed)
const result = format(validated)
// After: Clear, linear flow
const result = pipe(
input,
parse,
validate,
format
)
When to use pipe:
- 3+ transformations on the same data
- You find yourself naming throwaway variables
- Logic reads better top-to-bottom
When to skip pipe:
- Just 1-2 operations (direct call is fine)
- The operations don't naturally chain
2. Option: Handle Missing Values Without null Checks
Stop writing if (x !== null && x !== undefined) everywhere.
import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Defensive null checking
function getUserCity(user: User | null): string {
if (user === null) return 'Unknown'
if (user.address === null) return 'Unknown'
if (user.address.city === null) return 'Unknown'
return user.address.city
}
// After: Chain through potential missing values
const getUserCity = (user: User | null): string =>
pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)
Plain language translation:
O.fromNullable(x)= "wrap this value, treating null/undefined as 'nothing'"O.flatMap(fn)= "if we have something, apply this function"O.getOrElse(() => default)= "unwrap, or use this default if nothing"
3. Either: Make Errors Explicit
Stop throwing exceptions for expected failures. Return errors as values.
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Hidden failure mode
function parseAge(input: string): number {
const age = parseInt(input, 10)
if (isNaN(age)) throw new Error('Invalid age')
if (age < 0) throw new Error('Age cannot be negative')
return age
}
// After: Errors are visible in the type
function parseAge(input: string): E.Either<string, number> {
const age = parseInt(input, 10)
if (isNaN(age)) return E.left('Invalid age')
if (age < 0) return E.left('Age cannot be negative')
return E.right(age)
}
// Using it
const result = parseAge(userInput)
if (E.isRight(result)) {
console.log(`Age is ${result.right}`)
} else {
console.log(`Error: ${result.left}`)
}
Plain language translation:
E.right(value)= "success with this value"E.left(error)= "failure with this error"E.isRight(x)= "did it succeed?"
4. Map: Transform Without Unpacking
Transform values inside containers without extracting them first.
import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import * as A from 'fp-ts/Array'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Transform inside Option
const maybeUser: O.Option<User> = O.some({ name: 'Alice', age: 30 })
const maybeName: O.Option<string> = pipe(
maybeUser,
O.map(user => user.name)
)
// Transform inside Either
const result: E.Either<Error, number> = E.right(5)
const doubled: E.Either<Error, number> = pipe(
result,
E.map(n => n * 2)
)
// Transform arrays (same concept!)
const numbers = [1, 2, 3]
const doubled = pipe(
numbers,
A.map(n => n * 2)
)
5. FlatMap: Chain Operations That Might Fail
When each step might fail, chain them together.
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
const parseJSON = (s: string): E.Either<string, unknown> =>
E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(s), () => 'Invalid JSON')
const extractEmail = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, string> => {
if (typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'email' in data) {
return E.right((data as { email: string }).email)
}
return E.left('No email field')
}
const validateEmail = (email: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
email.includes('@') ? E.right(email) : E.left('Invalid email format')
// Chain all steps - if any fails, the whole thing fails
const getValidEmail = (input: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
pipe(
parseJSON(input),
E.flatMap(extractEmail),
E.flatMap(validateEmail)
)
// Success path: Right('user@example.com')
// Any failure: Left('specific error message')
Plain language: flatMap means "if this succeeded, try the next thing"
When NOT to Use FP
Functional programming is not always the answer. Here's when to keep it simple.
Simple Null Checks
// Just use optional chaining - it's built into the language
const city = user?.address?.city ?? 'Unknown'
// DON'T overcomplicate it
const city = pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)
Simple Loops
// A for loop is fine when you need early exit or complex logic
function findFirst(items: Item[], predicate: (i: Item) => boolean): Item | null {
for (const item of items) {
if (predicate(item)) return item
}
return null
}
// DON'T force FP when it doesn't help
const result = pipe(
items,
A.findFirst(predicate),
O.toNullable
)
Performance-Critical Code
// For hot paths, imperative is faster (no intermediate arrays)
function sumLarge(numbers: number[]): number {
let sum = 0
for (let i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
sum += numbers[i]
}
return sum
}
// fp-ts creates intermediate structures
const sum = pipe(numbers, A.reduce(0, (acc, n) => acc + n))
When Your Team Doesn't Know FP
If you're the only one who can read the code, it's not good code.
// If your team knows this pattern
async function getUser(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
try {
const response = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`)
if (!response.ok) return null
return await response.json()
} catch {
return null
}
}
// Don't force this on them
const getUser = (id: string): TE.TaskEither<Error, User> =>
pipe(
TE.tryCatch(() => fetch(`/api/users/${id}`), E.toError),
TE.flatMap(r => r.ok ? TE.right(r) : TE.left(new Error('Not found'))),
TE.flatMap(r => TE.tryCatch(() => r.json(), E.toError))
)
Quick Wins: Easy Changes That Improve Code Today
1. Replace Nested Ternaries with pipe + fold
// Before: Nested ternary nightmare
const message = user === null
? 'No user'
: user.isAdmin
? `Admin: ${user.name}`
: `User: ${user.name}`
// After: Clear case handling
const message = pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.fold(
() => 'No user',
(u) => u.isAdmin ? `Admin: ${u.name}` : `User: ${u.name}`
)
)
2. Replace try-catch with tryCatch
// Before: try-catch everywhere
let config
try {
config = JSON.parse(rawConfig)
} catch {
config = defaultConfig
}
// After: One-liner
const config = pipe(
E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(rawConfig), () => 'parse error'),
E.getOrElse(() => defaultConfig)
)
3. Replace undefined Returns with Option
// Before: Caller might forget to check
function findUser(id: string): User | undefined {
return users.find(u => u.id === id)
}
// After: Type forces caller to handle missing case
function findUser(id: string): O.Option<User> {
return O.fromNullable(users.find(u => u.id === id))
}
4. Replace Error Strings with Typed Errors
// Before: Just strings
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> {
// ...
return E.left('validation failed')
}
// After: Structured errors
type ValidationError = {
field: string
message: string
}
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<ValidationError, User> {
// ...
return E.left({ field: 'email', message: 'Invalid format' })
}
5. Use const Assertions for Error Types
// Create specific error types without classes
const NotFound = (id: string) => ({ _tag: 'NotFound' as const, id })
const Unauthorized = { _tag: 'Unauthorized' as const }
const ValidationFailed = (errors: string[]) =>
({ _tag: 'ValidationFailed' as const, errors })
type AppError =
| ReturnType<typeof NotFound>
| typeof Unauthorized
| ReturnType<typeof ValidationFailed>
// Now you can pattern match
const handleError = (error: AppError): string => {
switch (error._tag) {
case 'NotFound': return `Item ${error.id} not found`
case 'Unauthorized': return 'Please log in'
case 'ValidationFailed': return error.errors.join(', ')
}
}
Common Refactors: Before and After
Callback Hell to Pipe
// Before
fetchUser(id, (user) => {
if (!user) return handleNoUser()
fetchPosts(user.id, (posts) => {
if (!posts) return handleNoPosts()
fetchComments(posts[0].id, (comments) => {
render(user, posts, comments)
})
})
})
// After (with TaskEither for async)
import * as TE from 'fp-ts/TaskEither'
const loadData = (id: string) =>
pipe(
fetchUser(id),
TE.flatMap(user => pipe(
fetchPosts(user.id),
TE.map(posts => ({ user, posts }))
)),
TE.flatMap(({ user, posts }) => pipe(
fetchComments(posts[0].id),
TE.map(comments => ({ user, posts, comments }))
))
)
// Execute
const result = await loadData('123')()
pipe(
result,
E.fold(handleError, ({ user, posts, comments }) => render(user, posts, comments))
)
Multiple null Checks to Option Chain
// Before
function getManagerEmail(employee: Employee): string | null {
if (!employee.department) return null
if (!employee.department.manager) return null
if (!employee.department.manager.email) return null
return employee.department.manager.email
}
// After
const getManagerEmail = (employee: Employee): O.Option<string> =>
pipe(
O.fromNullable(employee.department),
O.flatMap(d => O.fromNullable(d.manager)),
O.flatMap(m => O.fromNullable(m.email))
)
// Use it
pipe(
getManagerEmail(employee),
O.fold(
() => sendToDefault(),
(email) => sendTo(email)
)
)
Validation with Multiple Checks
// Before: Throws on first error
function validateUser(data: unknown): User {
if (!data || typeof data !== 'object') throw new Error('Must be object')
const obj = data as Record<string, unknown>
if (typeof obj.email !== 'string') throw new Error('Email required')
if (!obj.email.includes('@')) throw new Error('Invalid email')
if (typeof obj.age !== 'number') throw new Error('Age required')
if (obj.age < 0) throw new Error('Age must be positive')
return obj as User
}
// After: Returns first error, type-safe
const validateUser = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> =>
pipe(
E.Do,
E.bind('obj', () =>
typeof data === 'object' && data !== null
? E.right(data as Record<string, unknown>)
: E.left('Must be object')
),
E.bind('email', ({ obj }) =>
typeof obj.email === 'string' && obj.email.includes('@')
? E.right(obj.email)
: E.left('Valid email required')
),
E.bind('age', ({ obj }) =>
typeof obj.age === 'number' && obj.age >= 0
? E.right(obj.age)
: E.left('Valid age required')
),
E.map(({ email, age }) => ({ email, age }))
)
Promise Chain to TaskEither
// Before
async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Receipt> {
const order = await fetchOrder(orderId)
if (!order) throw new Error('Order not found')
const validated = await validateOrder(order)
if (!validated.success) throw new Error(validated.error)
const payment = await processPayment(validated.order)
if (!payment.success) throw new Error('Payment failed')
return generateReceipt(payment)
}
// After
const processOrder = (orderId: string): TE.TaskEither<string, Receipt> =>
pipe(
fetchOrderTE(orderId),
TE.flatMap(order =>
order ? TE.right(order) : TE.left('Order not found')
),
TE.flatMap(validateOrderTE),
TE.flatMap(processPaymentTE),
TE.map(generateReceipt)
)
The Readability Rule
Before using any FP pattern, ask: "Would a junior developer understand this?"
Too Clever (Avoid)
const result = pipe(
data,
A.filter(flow(prop('status'), equals('active'))),
A.map(flow(prop('value'), multiply(2))),
A.reduce(monoid.concat, monoid.empty),
O.fromPredicate(gt(threshold))
)
Just Right (Prefer)
const activeItems = data.filter(item => item.status === 'active')
const doubledValues = activeItems.map(item => item.value * 2)
const total = doubledValues.reduce((sum, val) => sum + val, 0)
const result = total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
The Middle Ground (Often Best)
const result = pipe(
data,
A.filter(item => item.status === 'active'),
A.map(item => item.value * 2),
A.reduce(0, (sum, val) => sum + val),
total => total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
)
Cheat Sheet
| What you want | Plain language | fp-ts |
|---|---|---|
| Handle null/undefined | "Wrap this nullable" | O.fromNullable(x) |
| Default for missing | "Use this if nothing" | O.getOrElse(() => default) |
| Transform if present | "If something, change it" | O.map(fn) |
| Chain nullable operations | "If something, try this" | O.flatMap(fn) |
| Return success | "Worked, here's the value" | E.right(value) |
| Return failure | "Failed, here's why" | E.left(error) |
| Wrap throwing function | "Try this, catch errors" | E.tryCatch(fn, onError) |
| Handle both cases | "Do this for error, that for success" | E.fold(onLeft, onRight) |
| Chain operations | "Then do this, then that" | pipe(x, fn1, fn2, fn3) |
When to Level Up
Once comfortable with these patterns, explore:
- TaskEither - Async operations that can fail (replaces Promise + try/catch)
- Validation - Collect ALL errors instead of stopping at first
- Reader - Dependency injection without classes
- Do notation - Cleaner syntax for multiple bindings
But don't rush. The basics here will handle 80% of real-world scenarios. Get comfortable with these before adding more tools to your belt.
Summary
- Use pipe for 3+ operations
- Use Option for nullable chains
- Use Either for operations that can fail
- Use map to transform wrapped values
- Use flatMap to chain operations that might fail
- Skip FP when it hurts readability
- Keep it simple - if your team can't read it, it's not good code
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.