Design Sales Commission Plans
A prompt template that designs a sales commission plan - base/variable split, rate tiers, accelerators, and payout scenarios.
1.0.0Add to Favorites
Why it matters
Create competitive and motivating sales compensation structures tailored to your business goals and sales roles. This asset helps define clear commission tiers, bonus incentives, and payout scenarios.
Outcomes
What it gets done
Define base salary and variable compensation splits.
Structure commission rates based on performance tiers and accelerators.
Incorporate bonus incentives for specific achievements (e.g., new logos, multi-year deals).
Outline clawback provisions and provide example payout scenarios.
Install
Add it to your toolbox
Run in your project directory:
curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/vb-sales-commission | bash Overview
Sales Commission Plan
A prompt template that designs a sales commission plan - base/variable split, rate tiers, accelerators, clawbacks, and payout scenarios - for a specific role. Use it when designing or revising a role's commission plan with real OTE and quota figures, not as a compensation-benchmarking source for those figures themselves.
What it does
Sales Commission Plan is a prompt template that designs a compensation structure from a role, target on-target-earnings (OTE), base/variable split, quota type, sales cycle length, ACV range, and the specific business goals and behaviors to encourage. It generates five outputs: a compensation structure overview, commission rate tiers, a bonus/accelerator structure, clawback provisions, and example scenarios at different performance levels. It draws on named compensation components - base salary (typically 50-70% of OTE, tied to market rate and experience) and variable compensation (typically 30-50% of OTE, tied to performance) - and four commission structure types: linear (same rate for all sales), tiered (increasing rates at thresholds), accelerator (higher rates above quota), and decelerator (lower rates below a threshold). A worked Account Executive example shows a $150,000 OTE split 50/50 against a $1,000,000 quota, with rates from 5% below 80% attainment up to 12% above 120%, plus accelerators like a 1% bonus on multi-year deals and a $500 spiff per new logo; a parallel SDR example shows a $75,000 OTE weighted 67% base, paid per qualified meeting against a monthly quota with tier and stretch bonuses.
When to use - and when NOT to
Use this prompt when you're designing or revising a commission plan for a specific sales role and need the tiers, accelerators, and payout scenarios modeled out consistently rather than assembled ad hoc - it's built to make the plan's incentive design explicit so you can check whether it actually rewards the behaviors you listed as goals. It is not a compensation-benchmarking tool: the base/variable split and OTE figures still have to come from real market data for the role, not from the prompt itself.
Inputs and outputs
Inputs are the role, OTE target, base/variable split, quota type, sales cycle, ACV range, and business goals:
Design a sales commission plan for:
**Role:** [SDR/AE/AM/Sales Manager]
**Target OTE:** [On-target earnings]
**Base/Variable Split:** [60/40, 50/50, etc.]
**Quota Type:** [Revenue/Meetings/Pipeline]
**Sales Cycle:** [Average deal time]
**ACV Range:** [Deal sizes]
**Business Goals:**
- Primary metric: [What to optimize]
- Secondary metrics: [Other important factors]
- Behaviors to encourage: [Specific actions]
Outputs are a compensation structure overview, commission rate tiers, a bonus/accelerator structure, clawback provisions, and example payout scenarios at different performance levels.
Who it's for
Sales leaders and RevOps teams designing or revising a commission plan for a specific role who need the rate tiers, accelerators, and payout math modeled consistently against real quota and OTE figures, rather than built from scratch each time.
FAQ
Common questions
Discussion
Questions & comments · 0
Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.