Prompt

Generate Sales Objection Responses

Prompt for generating structured sales-objection responses using Feel-Felt-Found, reframe, and the LAER framework.


82
Spark score
out of 100
Updated 7 months ago
Version 1.0.0
Models

Add to Favorites

Why it matters

Overcome sales objections and advance deals with compelling, context-aware responses. This asset helps sales professionals navigate common objections by providing structured, effective replies.

Outcomes

What it gets done

01

Craft responses to specific sales objections

02

Utilize frameworks like Feel-Felt-Found and LAER

03

Tailor responses based on deal context and prospect type

04

Generate value-driven and curiosity-inducing replies

Install

Add it to your toolbox

Run in your project directory:

curl -fsSL https://spark.entire.vc/get/vb-objection-response | bash

Overview

Sales Objection Responses

A prompt for generating structured sales-objection responses across five methods (Feel-Felt-Found, question-based, reframe, social proof, direct address), plus ready-made frameworks for five common objections under the LAER model. Use it when a rep needs a specific objection-handling response for a live deal, not as a full sales-methodology or discovery-call script.

What it does

This prompt generates compelling, structured responses to sales objections designed to advance a deal rather than stall it. Given the exact objection phrase plus context - product/service, deal stage (Discovery/Demo/Proposal/Negotiation), prospect type and company size, and the likely root cause behind the objection - it produces responses using five methods: Feel-Felt-Found, a question-based response that digs deeper, a reframe approach, a social-proof response, and a direct-address response.

It also documents ready-made frameworks for five common objections: "It's too expensive" (a reframe questioning the cost of inaction, plus a value-math calculation tying the price to required ROI), "We're happy with our current solution" (a curiosity-based question about what they'd improve), "I need to think about it" (a clarifying question about which specific aspects they're weighing), "Send me more information" (a qualifying question about what information would actually help their decision), and "Not right now" (a timeline question about what would need to change to make it a priority). All of these are tied together by the LAER framework: Listen fully, Acknowledge the objection, Explore it with questions, and Respond to the real concern.

When to use - and when NOT to

Use it when a salesperson needs a structured response to a specific objection during a live or upcoming conversation - a price-based pushback, a status-quo defense, a stall, an information request, or a timing objection. It is not a full sales-methodology or discovery-call script - it is scoped to objection handling specifically, assuming the deal context is already known.

Inputs and outputs

Input is the exact objection phrase plus deal context (product, stage, prospect type, likely root cause). Output is a set of responses generated across the five response methods, or - for the five documented common objections - a ready-made reframe, curiosity, clarify, qualify, or timeline response plus the underlying LAER structure.

Who it's for

Sales reps and sales enablement teams preparing objection-handling responses for live deals.

Source README

Sales Objection Responses

Create compelling responses to sales objections that advance deals.

Prompt Template

Create responses to this sales objection:

**Objection:** "[Exact objection phrase]"
**Context:**
- Product/Service: [What you're selling]
- Deal Stage: [Discovery/Demo/Proposal/Negotiation]
- Prospect Type: [Title, company size]
- Likely Root Cause: [What's really behind the objection]

Generate responses using:
1. Feel-Felt-Found method
2. Question-based response (dig deeper)
3. Reframe approach
4. Social proof response
5. Direct address response

Common Objections & Frameworks

"It's too expensive"

Reframe: "I understand budget is important. Let me ask-what's the cost of not solving [problem] for another quarter?"

Value Math: "At $X/month, you'd need to [achieve specific result] to see ROI. Based on what you shared, that seems very achievable. Does that math work for you?"

"We're happy with our current solution"

Curiosity: "That's great-what do you like most about it? ...And if you could wave a magic wand and improve one thing?"

"I need to think about it"

Clarify: "Absolutely, this is an important decision. To help you think it through-what specific aspects are you weighing?"

"Send me more information"

Qualify: "Happy to-what specific information would be most helpful? I want to send exactly what you need for your decision."

"Not right now"

Timeline: "I hear you. When you say 'not right now,' what would need to change for this to become a priority?"

Response Framework: LAER

  • Listen: Fully hear the objection
  • Acknowledge: Show understanding
  • Explore: Ask questions to understand
  • Respond: Address the real concern

FAQ

Common questions

Discussion

Questions & comments · 0

Sign In Sign in to leave a comment.